Fuel consumption for Entity flights has been increased by 1.25-2.5 times.

Oh, but you can. Lvl is clickable and when clicked it shows summary from this on:



Misread again, not the old CRP, right...

I've misread it maybe and thought it was only affecting toss buildings. Still huuge nerf xerj

I'll just keep on adding here. Debris from lift was changed from 50% to 10% without even announce in balance notes. That is very big nerf.

Oh, that is so much nicer then receiving it at random moment for robbers to take.

Technology is now gone, but 50% was not refunded.

You need to send a ship with at least 100k cargo hold along with recyclers. For human that would be colony ship or juggernaut.

Zoom out galaxy map

Can I safely assume that satelite limit 3/tech level will also be 1/spire level for xerj?

Yes! You are tottally right, my bad.

This was indeed confusing. I should have said "if for the last upgrade to get planet I paid 100". Still, if CRP of level of spire is 1.7 and 3 levels are needed to get planet it means CRP for planet is 9.5.
And now you say current spire has problem of high initil cost. Initial cost of spire is way less then initial cost of tech (at least for xerj).

In your calculations you are showing Cost(L+3). What you should check is Cost(L+1) + Cost(L+2) + Cost(L+3) because this is cost required to bump number of planets using spire. It's what I am trying to point out from the very first post.

This is exactly how it works. 3 levels of spire do not have CRP equivalent of 1.7^3. 3rd level from the current has, but I still need to build 1st and 2nd before 3rd, right? If up to level x I paied 100 units, then to get to level of x+3 (which is next planet) I need to pay:
x+1 -> 100*1.7
x+2 -> (100*1.7)*1.7
x+3 -> ((100*1.7)*1.7)*1.7

100*1.7 + (100*1.7)*1.7 + ((100*1.7)*1.7)*1.7 = 950.3 giving CRP 9.5 in terms of gaining additional slot for planet.

Now you show that is cheaper for xerj. True at some point, because of different initial costs, but in the long term the sum of geometric progress is given by:

initial_cost * (1-CRP^level)/(1-CRP)

will always follow CRP^n and not initial_cost. Here some plots for the difference to play with. a,b will be initial costs, n number of planet slots:
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=plot+y%3D+a*%281-9.5%5Ex%29%2F%281-9.5%29+-
+b*%281-5.5%5Ex%29%2F%281-5.5%29%2C+x+in+%5B1%2C+10%5D

Said all that it might be that within resonably accessable range of levels, like you say, it's mostly fair. But in hyphotetical long term it is for sure not.

Would you admins be so kind and redo your math? This is huge nerf to xerj making it so much more expensive to get more objects compared to other 2 races.

In order to increase number of planets by 1 toss and terran needs to invest 5.5 more then for previous increase.
In order to increase number of planets by 1 xerj needs to upgrade spire by 3 levels with CRP 1.7, so 1.7 + 1.7^2 + 1.7^3 = 9.5 times more then for previous increase. It's not 3*1.7 which would be comparable.

If you want to just move colonization to building, while keeping long term balance then I think CRP of spire needs to be reduced from 1.7 to 1.3 to match with colonization CRP 5.5. (5.2 vs 1.3 would be really close).


Also I think it would be fair to issue resources from technology being removed week before planets are forcfully decolonized. You say we can use it to cover expanses, but the way change is described we actually need to put all the construction costs upfront. Not to mention building spire to 21 or 24 takes huge ammount of time.

Ah, I see! Somehow I did not think about all those OPSs with insect. That is actually nerfing others more then xerj. I take it back.

Avarage cost of moon for xerj is around 20M metal + 20M mineral. Even bit less if you are fine with smaller size. You might be doing it wrong if you get such a high expected cost.

I think it's a nerf for majority of people. It's only potential for biggest players. Also in the topic you link the guy is actually complaining about that increasing time to travel.

I am considering dunk change yet another nerf ;) It's how much? 250M metal just to get to the previous values. It's quite an amount of dunks you would need to have to make it more efficient to lvl up the tech instead of insectoid.

Thank you. I like the general direction with amortization, def buff and OPSs more available for small players. I'll just wait and see where it goes.

From the ideas I think allowing trading from bestiary lvl1, but thaere is already something in ssenate about it. And dunk could use local coord speed and some way of preventing being stopped by a single gun rather then regeneration. But I am probably not the best player to judge if it make sense.

I cannot help but notice that most of the recent changes are nerfing xerf the most:

- production on main buildings cut down by 15% - terran also
- scourges dmg reduced (again)
- visibility changes. This is small nerf as it affects everyone but xerj was the only race that could get this from officer
- OPS changes. This is actually big. One of the advantages of xerj was cheap station building. In return they get no realiable usage for GG, with only one (veeery expensive) officer and no techs to support. Now OPSs are easier to get which balances down advantage from dunks, but xerj still has no gravity guns. On top of that xerj is only race using ships to propagate network. OPSs cannot be captured but planetoids still can be destroyed
- bestiary range. Affects everyone but still xerj suffer the most since it is the race building markets.
- hangar buffed, vikings buffed, fastling - nerfed
- L/R turrets buffed

All other changes since May are even. I really hope there is something behind it and "the change" is coming. Otherwise this looks to me like, maybe unintentional, but still very ugly trend.

cheers!

*acid spores?
*of shields?